Jorge L. Flores has thirty years in Florida medical malpractice, including years on the defense side before transitioning to represent families. The firm reads diagnostic-error charts the way the defense reads them; what is documented, and what is missing.
Florida is one of the strictest states for misdiagnosis plaintiffs. Under Gooding v. University Hospital, 445 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1984), a plaintiff must prove the underlying condition had a greater than 50 percent chance of survival or recovery before the diagnostic failure.
Deadlines are short and the pre-suit investigation alone takes ninety days. The right time to call counsel is now.
♦ AV Preeminent® Rated♦ Board Certified Civil Trial♦ Statewide Florida
Misdiagnosis Result
$12.25M
Verdict for failure to diagnose ischemic stroke; catastrophic permanent injuries.
Annual Diagnostic Harm
795,000
Americans permanently disabled or killed each year by diagnostic errors. Source: BMJ Quality & Safety, 2023.
Florida Causation Standard
> 50%
Required survival or recovery probability before the error under Gooding (Fla. 1984).
Key Points about Florida Misdiagnosis Law
I
Governed by Florida Statute § 766.102
Florida diagnostic-error claims are evaluated under the “prevailing professional standard of care,” the statutory standard that governs all Florida medical malpractice cases and requires expert testimony to establish.
II
The Gooding 51% rule is Florida’s strictest causation barrier
Florida explicitly rejects loss-of-chance recovery. The plaintiff must prove the underlying condition had a greater than 50 percent chance of survival or recovery before the diagnostic failure.
III
Same-specialty experts are required under § 766.102(5)
The pre-suit expert must specialize in the exact same specialty as the defendant and must have devoted professional time during the three years before the incident to active clinical practice in that specialty.
IV
Two-year SOL with a discovery rule
Under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(b), the deadline runs two years from discovery, with a four-year outer repose; a fraud-and-concealment exception extends to seven years.
Every Florida misdiagnosis case begins with the same question: what was on the differential, and what was ruled out. The medical record reveals exactly which questions the doctor asked and which they did not. Our job is to read it honestly.
Jorge L. Flores, Esq.
§01Definition
01 · Definition
What is medical misdiagnosis under Florida law?
A Florida medical misdiagnosis claim arises when a healthcare provider failed to identify, identified incorrectly, or unreasonably delayed identifying a patient’s medical condition, and that diagnostic failure caused measurable harm. Diagnostic errors are not all alike; Florida law and standard medical literature recognize four distinct subtypes, each with its own clinical pattern and its own evidentiary fingerprint.
Subtype 01
Failed Diagnosis
No diagnosis is given despite the presence of clinical signs that should have prompted one. Common in cases of missed cancer, missed sepsis, and missed stroke in early presentation.
Subtype 02
Incorrect Diagnosis
A wrong condition is identified and treated, while the actual disease progresses untreated. Heart attacks treated as anxiety; pulmonary embolism treated as bronchitis; aortic dissection treated as musculoskeletal pain.
Subtype 03
Delayed Diagnosis
The correct diagnosis is eventually reached, but only after the time-sensitive treatment window has closed. The injury is the loss of treatment options that an earlier diagnosis would have preserved.
Subtype 04
Partial Diagnosis
One condition is correctly identified while a coexisting and equally significant condition is missed. The treated condition improves while the untreated one worsens, often the more dangerous of the two.
Under Florida Statute § 766.102, a medical malpractice plaintiff must prove that the provider failed to meet the “prevailing professional standard of care” for similar providers under similar circumstances. Establishing that element requires testimony from a qualified medical expert who practices in the same specialty as the defendant. The 2013 amendments to Florida law eliminated the prior allowance for similar-specialty experts; the expert match must be exact.
Qualified Same-Specialty Experts in Florida Misdiagnosis Cases
Roughly three quarters of all serious diagnostic harm comes from a small set of conditions. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine refer to these collectively as the “Big Three”: cancers, vascular events, and infections. Together they account for approximately 75 percent of all diagnostic-error injuries that result in permanent disability or death.
Cancers
37.8%
of serious diagnostic harm
Vascular Events
22.8%
of serious diagnostic harm
Infections
13.5%
of serious diagnostic harm
Combined
~75%
of all serious cases
Category
Most-Missed Conditions
Why It Is Missed
Cancers
Lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, melanoma
Symptoms attributed to less serious conditions; staging at diagnosis controls survival.
Systemic signs missed on examination; sepsis becomes fatal within hours of presentation.
Source data: BMJ Quality & Safety, 2023 (Newman-Toker et al.) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Approximately 795,000 Americans per year suffer permanent disability or death from diagnostic errors; the Big Three account for roughly three quarters of those serious cases.
§03The 51% Rule
03 · The Causation Rule
Florida’s 51% rule under Gooding
Florida is one of the strictest states in the country for misdiagnosis plaintiffs. The reason is a single Florida Supreme Court case from 1984. Under Gooding v. University Hospital Building, Inc., 445 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1984), Florida explicitly rejected the “loss of chance” doctrine that most other states recognize. A misdiagnosis plaintiff in Florida must prove the underlying condition had a greater than 50 percent chance of recovery or survival before the diagnostic failure.
Florida Supreme CourtGooding v. University Hospital, 445 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1984)
“A plaintiff in a medical malpractice action must show more than a decreased chance of survival because of a defendant’s conduct. The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s negligence probably caused the plaintiff’s injury.”
Outside Florida, many state supreme courts permit a plaintiff to recover when a doctor’s error reduced the patient’s chance of survival from, say, 35 percent to 15 percent. Recovery is calculated as the difference: a 20-percentage-point loss of chance, valued accordingly. Florida does not allow this. If the disease itself reduced the patient’s odds below 51 percent before the doctor ever saw the patient, Florida law treats the disease, not the misdiagnosis, as the probable cause; the claim fails.
Why the 51% Rule Is the Biggest Obstacle in Florida
The math of cancer staging makes Florida cases inherently harder
Many serious misdiagnosis cases involve aggressive cancers and vascular events where survival probabilities are already compressed by the disease before the diagnostic failure. The plaintiff’s expert must establish, with same-specialty epidemiologic data, that the patient’s condition had a survival or recovery probability above 50 percent at the time the diagnostic decision was made. Without that proof, the case is dead before it starts.
The firm understands this rule and approaches Florida misdiagnosis cases by building the causation case first, before the standard-of-care case. The order matters. A breach of the standard of care that fails the Gooding test produces no recovery. The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., evaluates whether the case can clear the 51 percent threshold at intake; cases that cannot are not pursued, and families are told honestly why. Cases that can are documented from day one with the same-specialty epidemiologic evidence the trial will require.
§04How It Happens
04 · Cognitive & System Failures
How misdiagnosis actually happens
Most diagnostic errors are not the result of a missing test or absent medical knowledge. They are the result of recognized cognitive patterns that distort how a clinician interprets the information that is in front of them. Five biases account for the bulk of cognitive misdiagnosis in modern Florida medicine; system failures account for most of the rest.
Bias 01
Anchoring
The clinician latches onto the first plausible diagnosis and weighs subsequent information through that lens. Findings that fit the anchor are emphasized; findings that contradict it are minimized.
Bias 02
Premature Closure
The differential diagnosis is closed before alternative explanations have been adequately considered. Common in busy emergency departments and high-volume clinics.
Bias 03
Confirmation Bias
The clinician seeks information that confirms the working diagnosis and disregards information that would refute it. Subsequent imaging or laboratory work is read in the light of the diagnosis already chosen.
Bias 04
Availability Heuristic
The diagnosis the clinician saw last week dominates the current decision. Rare but lethal conditions are systematically under-considered because they appear less often in recent memory.
Bias 05
Diagnostic Momentum
A diagnosis affixed by one provider is carried forward by every provider who sees the patient afterward, without independent reassessment. Errors compound across handoffs.
In Court
These biases are not legal defenses
Florida juries are not asked whether the doctor’s thought process was understandable. They are asked whether the doctor’s decision met the prevailing professional standard of care.
System failures that produce diagnostic errors
Beyond cognitive bias, several institutional patterns recur in Florida diagnostic-error litigation. They are typically the basis for direct hospital liability, separate from the individual provider’s liability:
· Failure to communicate abnormal test results
· Lost or delayed laboratory and pathology reports
· Inadequate handoff communication between shifts
· Missed or ignored critical-value alerts
· Triage protocols that under-prioritize atypical presentations
· Inadequate radiology over-read or peer review
· Failure to arrange specialist consultation
· Discharge before diagnostic uncertainty resolved
§05Demographic Risk
05 · Higher-Risk Populations
Who is at higher risk for misdiagnosis in Florida
Diagnostic errors are not distributed evenly across the patient population. Several demographic groups face statistically higher rates of misdiagnosis, often because their presentations are read against a clinical baseline that does not fit them. The pattern is well documented in the medical literature.
Group 01
Women
Heart attacks, strokes, and autoimmune conditions in women are routinely missed when the textbook presentation reflects the male norm. Atypical chest pain attributed to anxiety is the recurring pattern in Florida emergency departments.
Group 02
Elderly Patients
Symptoms of acute vascular events and infections present atypically in older adults. Confusion attributed to dementia, weakness attributed to age, and falls attributed to frailty all conceal underlying diagnostic emergencies.
Group 03
Children
Pediatric patients cannot articulate what they feel. Sepsis, meningitis, appendicitis, and intussusception are missed when the clinician relies on adult-oriented presentation patterns. Parental concern, when discounted, is itself a recurring trigger of error.
Group 04
Non-English Speakers
History-taking through inadequate interpretation, or worse through family-member translation, omits the symptom detail that drives a correct differential. Florida’s large Spanish-speaking population is particularly affected; the firm offers fully bilingual representation as a structural response.
If You Suspect a Missed or Delayed Diagnosis
If a doctor missed your condition, gave you the wrong diagnosis, or delayed treatment until it was too late, the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., will review your medical records at no cost. Florida’s deadlines are short and the pre-suit investigation alone takes ninety days; calling early preserves options that calling late cannot.
Florida’s mandatory pre-suit process for misdiagnosis claims
Florida is one of the few states that requires a mandatory pre-suit investigation before any medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. The process is governed by Fla. Stat. § 766.106 and § 766.203. Failing to comply results in dismissal regardless of the strength of the underlying medical evidence. For misdiagnosis cases specifically, the corroborating affidavit is the document the defense attacks first; a thin or hedged affidavit can sink an otherwise strong case at the motion-to-dismiss stage. The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., builds these affidavits with that scrutiny in mind from the start.
Step 1
Records review
The firm orders and reviews the complete chart from every provider who evaluated the patient before the correct diagnosis was reached. Office visit notes, laboratory results, imaging reports, referral records, and electronic-health-record audit trails are all reviewed. The audit trail often reveals what the clinician saw, when, and what they clicked on next.
Step 2
Same-specialty expert evaluation
Under § 766.102(5), the expert must specialize in the exact same specialty as the defendant and must have devoted professional time during the three years preceding the incident to active clinical practice in that specialty. The 2013 amendments eliminated the prior allowance for similar-specialty experts.
Step 3
Corroborating affidavit
Under § 766.203, the expert must reduce the opinion to a written corroborating affidavit. Defense counsel reads this affidavit word by word looking for places to challenge the expert’s qualifications or the sufficiency of the opinion.
Step 4
Notice of Intent served
The firm serves each prospective defendant with a statutory Notice of Intent under § 766.106, including the corroborating affidavit and the factual basis for the claim.
Step 5
90-day pre-suit window
A mandatory 90-day investigation period begins. The statute of limitations is tolled during this period. Both sides may exchange information under pre-suit discovery rules.
Step 6
Defense response
At the end of the 90 days, the defense must reject the claim, offer to settle, or offer binding arbitration. Many strong misdiagnosis cases resolve favorably during this window because the corroborating affidavit makes the standard-of-care analysis hard to defend.
Step 7
Filing or settlement
If the case survives pre-suit, the complaint is filed in the appropriate Florida circuit court. Florida requires mandatory mediation, typically within 120 days of filing. For the full statutory mechanics, see our Pre-Suit Requirements pillar.
§07Damages
07 · Damages Framework
Damages you may recover in a Florida misdiagnosis case
Florida medical malpractice damages fall into three categories. The framework that applies to misdiagnosis cases today is more favorable to plaintiffs than many families realize, but the legislative landscape is in active flux and any new cap statute could change the calculation in pending cases.
Economic Damages
Uncapped
Past and future medical treatment, long-term care, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, and out-of-pocket expenses. Economic damages have never been capped in Florida medical malpractice cases. Documented and projected by life-care planners and forensic economists.
Non-Economic Damages
Currently uncapped
Pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life. The statutory caps in § 766.118 were struck down in Estate of McCall (2014) and Kalitan (2017) as Equal Protection violations.
Punitive Damages
Capped under § 768.73
Available for intentional misconduct or gross negligence. Capped at the greater of three times compensatory damages or $500,000, with statutory exceptions. Procedural gatekeeper under § 768.72 requires court permission before assertion.
2026 Legislative Update
SB 248 has been filed for the 2026 Florida legislative session
SB 248 would re-impose a $750,000 cap on non-economic damages. As of the date of this guide, SB 248 has not received a committee hearing, and any new cap statute would likely face constitutional challenge under the same equal-protection analysis that governed McCall and Kalitan. Cases are valued under the law in force at the time of resolution; counsel will advise on how the legislative environment may affect a specific matter.
Cases against public hospitals, county health departments, state university medical schools, and physicians employed by such entities are subject to sovereign immunity caps under § 768.28: $200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident, regardless of the severity of the injury. The early identification of the defendant’s employment status is among the most consequential strategic decisions in a Florida misdiagnosis case.
Recent diagnostic-error matters from the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A. See our full Case Results page for additional matters.
Verdict · Hospital Negligence
$12.25M
Failure to diagnose ischemic stroke, resulting in catastrophic permanent injuries. Same-specialty experts established the standard-of-care breach and the Gooding causation threshold.
Resolution · Delayed Diagnosis
$8.25M
Failure to timely diagnose evolving stroke. Diagnostic momentum carried an initial misimpression forward across multiple shifts before the correct diagnosis was made.
Resolution · Hematology
$4.25M
Failure to timely diagnose and treat thrombocytopenia. Laboratory audit trail and the documented sequence of missed alerts were central.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own merits; past results are not a guarantee of future outcomes. Information presented here was not reviewed or approved by The Florida Bar. The information was provided by the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., 7700 N Kendall Drive, Suite 708, Miami, Florida 33156. Jorge L. Flores, Esq. is responsible for content; Florida Bar No. 53244.
Wondering Whether You Have a Case
Most families with serious diagnostic harm have a stronger Florida case than they realize, and a meaningful share have a case that fails the Gooding threshold. The only way to know is a records review. The firm does that at no cost.
09 · Why Families Choose the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A.
Four reasons Florida families trust this misdiagnosis law firm
Former defense-side perspective
Before representing families, Jorge Flores represented Florida hospitals, physicians, and their insurance carriers. That insider perspective informs every strategic decision in a misdiagnosis case, from the first records request through the cross-examination at trial.
Medical malpractice exclusively
The firm handles medical malpractice cases exclusively. Misdiagnosis litigation requires fluency with the prevailing standards across emergency medicine, oncology, neurology, cardiology, and radiology. It is not a field for generalist personal-injury firms.
Statewide Florida reach
The firm represents Florida families statewide, with working familiarity with the circuit courts, defense firms, and same-specialty expert networks active in misdiagnosis litigation across every major Florida market.
Bilingual representation
Every stage of every case is handled in English or Spanish, from intake through resolution. Florida families often deal with medical records and provider notes in both languages; bilingual representation is a working requirement in much of the state.
§10Conditions
10 · Conditions Handled
Misdiagnosed conditions handled by the firm
The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., handles misdiagnosis matters across the categories below. Each condition links to a dedicated case page with the specific Florida standards of care, expert specialties, and case-strategy considerations that apply.
Atypical presentation (vertigo, headache, confusion) regularly attributed to migraine or anxiety; the treatment window for thrombolytics is missed in the first hours.
A high-mortality emergency that presents as chest, back, or abdominal pain; misattribution to less catastrophic causes is the dominant failure mode in Florida ER settings.
Lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and melanoma are the five most-missed in Florida primary-care and specialist settings; staging at diagnosis materially affects survival and case value.
Sepsis becomes fatal within hours; failure to recognize systemic inflammatory response or to escalate antibiotic and supportive therapy is among the most common Florida malpractice fact patterns.
Tumors, fractures, and bleeds missed on imaging that was actually performed; the radiology report itself is the central piece of evidence in these matters.
Atypical cardiac presentations (especially in women) are dismissed as anxiety or indigestion; pulmonary embolism is missed when D-dimer and imaging workups are skipped.
The correct diagnosis is eventually reached, but only after a critical treatment window has closed; staging or progression-based damages are central.
§11Emerging Area
11 · AI Diagnostic Errors
An emerging area: AI-assisted diagnostic errors
Florida hospitals have begun integrating artificial-intelligence-assisted tools into radiology, pathology, dermatology, and emergency-department workflows. A new category of diagnostic-error claim is appearing in cases where the AI tool failed to flag a finding, where the human clinician over-relied on the AI output, or where the institution adopted the technology without adequate validation. The standard-of-care framework for these cases is evolving, and there is no settled Florida-specific verdict data yet.
Families pursuing such cases should retain counsel familiar with both traditional misdiagnosis practice and the documentation that AI-integrated workflows produce, including the audit logs that show what the model was asked, what it returned, and how the clinician acted on the output. The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., is currently reviewing matters in this area as Florida case law develops.
12 · Reputation & Peer Recognition
Recognized by peers, rated by clients
As a Florida misdiagnosis law firm, the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., is peer-reviewed by fellow Florida attorneys and publicly rated by clients. The recognitions below reflect independent third-party evaluation of the firm’s misdiagnosis and medical-malpractice practice.
Peer Review · Fellow Attorney
“Jorge is an exemplary attorney who embodies the personification of self-respect and the respect of others. His knowledge of the law and the application of the law to achieve the best results for his clients is absolutely amazing.”
Fellow Florida Attorney· via Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review · Fellow Attorney
“Dedicated to seeking justice with hard work, preparation, and high ethical standards. Excellent litigation skills.”
Fellow Florida Attorney· via Martindale-Hubbell
Martindale-Hubbell
AV Preeminent® Rated
The highest peer rating for legal ability and professional ethics, based on confidential peer reviews from other attorneys and judges.
4.9
★★★★★
Client Rating
30 Google Reviews
Average 4.9 out of 5 stars across the firm’s full practice history on Google.
Peer reviews reflect the professional opinion of other attorneys, not a prediction of case outcome. Florida Bar rules prohibit lawyer testimonials that create unjustified expectations about results; every case is evaluated on its own merits. The aggregate rating reflects Google reviews of the firm across its full practice history.
13 · Common Questions
Florida misdiagnosis FAQs
How do I know if I have a Florida misdiagnosis lawsuit?
A Florida misdiagnosis claim requires three elements: a healthcare provider failed to identify, delayed, or incorrectly identified your condition; that failure caused measurable harm such as worsened condition, missed treatment window, or unnecessary treatment; and a same-specialty expert can opine that the standard of care was breached. Florida law also requires that you had a greater than 50 percent chance of survival or recovery before the error under Gooding (1984).
What is the statute of limitations for a Florida misdiagnosis claim?
Two years from the date the injury was discovered or should have been discovered, with a four-year outer limit from the date of the negligent act under § 95.11(4)(b). Misdiagnoses are inherently hidden errors, which makes the discovery rule central. A fraud or concealment exception extends the deadline up to seven years. Children injured at birth have through their eighth birthday under Tony’s Law.
What is Florida’s 51 percent rule?
Florida explicitly rejects the loss-of-chance doctrine. Under Gooding v. University Hospital Building, Inc., 445 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1984), a misdiagnosis plaintiff must prove the underlying condition had a greater than 50 percent chance of recovery or survival before the diagnostic error. If the disease already reduced odds below 51 percent, Florida law bars the claim, ruling that the disease, not the misdiagnosis, was the probable cause.
Do I need a same-specialty expert in a Florida misdiagnosis case?
Yes. Under § 766.102(5), the pre-suit expert must specialize in the exact same specialty as the defendant and must have devoted professional time during the three years preceding the incident to active clinical practice in that specialty. The 2013 amendments eliminated the prior allowance for similar-specialty experts. Selecting the wrong expert results in dismissal regardless of underlying merit.
Can I sue a Florida emergency room for misdiagnosis?
Yes. ER misdiagnosis is among the most common Florida malpractice fact patterns. Common claims involve missed strokes, missed heart attacks, missed pulmonary embolism, missed sepsis, missed aortic dissection, and missed compartment syndrome. ER cases often involve multiple defendants, including hospital-employed emergency groups and contracted emergency-medicine staffing companies. The standard-of-care analysis must reflect the constraints of the ER setting.
How long does a Florida misdiagnosis case take to resolve?
Florida law mandates a 90-day pre-suit investigation period under § 766.106 before any complaint can be filed. With investigation and same-specialty expert review, most Florida misdiagnosis cases are in pre-suit for three to six months. After filing, the typical duration to resolution is 18 to 36 months. Catastrophic cases or cases with contested causation can extend beyond three years.
Does Florida cap medical malpractice damages?
The statutory caps in § 766.118 were struck down by the Florida Supreme Court in Estate of McCall (2014) and Kalitan (2017) and remain unenforceable. SB 248 has been filed for the 2026 session and would re-impose a $750,000 cap; SB 248 has not received a committee hearing as of this writing, and any new cap statute would likely face constitutional challenge. Economic damages have never been capped. Public-hospital cases are subject to sovereign immunity caps under § 768.28.
What does it cost to hire a Florida misdiagnosis lawyer?
The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., handles misdiagnosis cases on a contingency basis. Families pay no attorney fee unless the firm recovers. Case costs (same-specialty experts, records, depositions, filing fees), which can exceed $100,000 in complex misdiagnosis cases, are advanced by the firm and deducted from the recovery. Florida Bar rules govern the maximum contingency percentage. The initial consultation is free.
What is the “differential diagnosis” in a Florida misdiagnosis case?
A differential diagnosis is the structured list of possible conditions a competent physician builds from the patient’s presenting symptoms, ranked by lethality and systematically ruled out through testing. In Florida misdiagnosis litigation, the central question is whether a reasonably prudent same-specialty physician would have included the actual disease on that list and performed the tests necessary to rule it in or out. The medical record reveals which tests were ordered and which were not.
How do cognitive biases factor into a Florida misdiagnosis case?
Cognitive biases such as anchoring, premature closure, and diagnostic momentum explain how diagnostic errors occur, but they are not legal defenses. Florida juries are not asked whether the doctor’s thought process was understandable; they are asked whether the decision met the prevailing professional standard of care. Documenting the bias pattern can be useful in establishing breach, but the legal question is the standard, not the psychology.
What if the misdiagnosis happened at a public Florida hospital?
Cases against public hospitals, county health departments, state university medical schools, and physicians employed by such entities are subject to sovereign immunity caps under § 768.28: $200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. The early identification of the defendant’s employment status is among the most consequential strategic decisions in a Florida misdiagnosis case and should be confirmed before any pre-suit notice is served.
What should I do if I think I was misdiagnosed in Florida?
Request the complete medical records from every provider who evaluated you before the correct diagnosis was made, including office visit notes, laboratory results, imaging reports, and referral records. Document the timeline (when you first reported each symptom, which doctor you saw, what they told you). Then contact a Florida medical malpractice attorney before the two-year statute of limitations runs. The pre-suit process alone takes at least 90 days.
Serving Families Across Florida
Florida misdiagnosis lawyers serving all 67 counties
The Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., represents Florida families in Miami, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, St. Petersburg, Gainesville, Pensacola, and communities throughout the state. Every consultation is free; the firm takes calls in English and in Spanish.
Miami
Jackson Memorial area
Tampa
Tampa General area
Orlando
Orlando Health area
Jacksonville
UF Health area
St. Petersburg
All Children’s area
Fort Lauderdale
Broward Health area
Hollywood
Memorial Regional area
West Palm Beach
St. Mary’s area
Fort Myers
Lee Health area
Gainesville
UF Shands area
Pensacola
Sacred Heart area
Statewide
All 67 counties
Free Consultation · Hablamos Español
If a Florida hospital or doctor missed your diagnosis, the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., is ready to review your case today.
The firm represents families statewide. Every consultation is free, and no fee is collected unless the firm recovers compensation for you.
