Florida Emergency Room Malpractice: Delays, Errors & Your Rights

Emergency room malpractice occurs when ER staff fail to meet the standard of care, causing patient harm. Common errors include triage mistakes, diagnostic delays, misdiagnosis of serious conditions, and systemic failures like understaffing.

In the Chaos, Care Must Prevail

An emergency room is a place of organized chaos, where life or death decisions are made in minutes. When you rush to the ER, you place your life in the hands of the medical team, trusting them to act quickly and competently.

The pace in Florida ERs is often fast and frantic, and communication can break down amidst the flurry of activity. Not every bad outcome in the ER is malpractice. Doctors and nurses must often make difficult calls with limited information under high pressure. However, when that trust is broken when a critical diagnosis is missed, treatment is dangerously delayed, or a careless mistake is made the results can be catastrophic.

In such an environment mistakes can happen, but if a patient’s injury is caused by a provider’s failure to follow the established standard of care, it is not just an unfortunate event; it is negligence. For patients and families harmed by these preventable errors, understanding the line between a medical crisis and medical malpractice is the first step toward finding answers and demanding justice.

What Is Emergency Room Malpractice in Florida?

Emergency room malpractice is a specific type of medical negligence that occurs when an ER doctor, nurse, or other staff member fails to provide the level of care that a reasonably prudent medical provider would have under similar circumstances, resulting in harm to a patient. Florida law defines this as a breach of the prevailing professional standard of care. In simple terms, the prevailing professional standard of care is “that level of care, skill, and treatment which, in light of all relevant surrounding circumstances, is recognized as acceptable and appropriate by reasonably prudent similar health care providers”.

This standard isn’t about perfection; it acknowledges the high stress nature of emergency medicine. Instead, it asks a fundamental question: did the ER team’s actions (or inaction) align with what a competent professional with similar training would have done in the same situation? If the answer is no, and you were injured as a direct result, you may have a valid malpractice claim. In practice, ER malpractice can stem from clear negligence like misdiagnoses, delayed treatment, failure to order proper tests, medication errors, or poor staff communication.

These cases often hinge on showing that a preventable delay or mistake rather than the patient’s underlying medical condition was the primary cause of the harm.

Emergency room doctor in blue scrubs reviewing X-ray while examining male patient experiencing chest pain in hospital bed, with medical staff and equipment visible in busy ER background

Dangerous Delays: When Waiting Becomes Negligence

Time is a critical factor in the ER. While some waiting is expected, an unreasonable delay in care can be a form of malpractice if it leads to a worse outcome. Negligent delays often stem from systemic breakdowns or individual oversights that violate standard ER protocols. Here are a few common scenarios where waiting too long crosses the line into negligence:

Triage Errors

Triage is the process of prioritizing patients based on the severity of their condition. A patient arriving with signs of a stroke or heart attack should be seen before someone with a minor fracture. Misjudging a patient’s symptoms at the door and sending a critically ill person back to the waiting room can cost precious minutes. Failing to put an extremely sick patient at the front of the line may be negligence rising to the level of malpractice. For example, if a patient with severe chest pain is made to wait so long that they suffer a heart attack before treatment, that delay could be considered negligent care.

Failure to Diagnose in a Timely Manner

Once a patient is being examined, the ER doctor must work efficiently to order the right tests and interpret the results. Ignoring obvious symptoms, failing to order a necessary CT scan or blood test, or letting critical lab results sit unnoticed for hours can all constitute a breach of care. Such lapses can delay the diagnosis of life threatening conditions. If a doctor delays ordering tests or misreads results and a serious illness (like a brain bleed or infection) worsens as a result, it can meet the criteria for malpractice.

Delays in Consultation or Transfer

Emergency physicians often rely on on call specialists (like cardiologists or neurosurgeons) and may need to transfer patients to facilities with higher levels of care. If an ER doctor recognizes a serious problem but fails to call a specialist promptly, the patient’s condition can deteriorate while waiting.

Likewise, if a small community hospital isn’t equipped to treat a major trauma or stroke, a failure to transfer the patient quickly to a better equipped hospital can be deadly. In Florida, even a short delay in administering life saving treatment or moving a patient to the right facility can have severe consequences and if that delay was due to negligence, it may constitute malpractice.

Critical Mistakes: Misdiagnosis and Treatment Errors

Beyond delays, active mistakes in diagnosis and treatment are a common source of ER malpractice claims. These errors often happen when providers are overworked, fail to communicate, or jump to conclusions without a thorough evaluation:

Misdiagnosis of a Life-Threatening Condition

This is one of the most frequent and dangerous ER errors. A doctor might dismiss the crushing chest pain of a heart attack as simple indigestion, a pulmonary embolism as a bout of anxiety, or the classic signs of a stroke as a migraine.

When a patient is sent home with a clean bill of health only to suffer a catastrophic event hours later, that misdiagnosis is often the result of negligence. In fact, a major 2022 study estimated that more than 7 million incorrect diagnoses are made in U.S. emergency rooms every year, with strokes, heart attacks, aortic dissections, spinal cord injuries, and blood clots among the most commonly missed conditions.

Such diagnostic errors account for roughly 40% of the harm in misdiagnosed ER patients. Simply put, missing a serious diagnosis in the ER can be fatal, and it usually happens because proper procedures like careful differential diagnosis or ordering the right tests were not followed.

Medication Errors

In the fast paced ER environment, medication mistakes can and do happen. Administering the wrong drug, the wrong dosage, or a medication to which a patient has a known allergy is a clear and preventable error. These lapses often occur due to miscommunication, illegible handwriting, or a failure to review the patient’s medical history in the rush of an emergency. The chaos of an ER can lead to gaps in communication and verification, increasing the risk of medication errors.

The consequences can range from severe allergic reactions to toxic overdoses. For example, giving a potent painkiller to the wrong patient, or double dosing a powerful sedative, can cause immediate harm. Such errors are considered substandard care because a reasonably careful provider would have checked and cross checked the medication orders before administration.

Misinterpretation of Test Results

Ordering the correct diagnostic test is only half the battle the results must also be interpreted correctly. An ER doctor might obtain an X ray, CT scan, or lab test but then fail to recognize a glaring abnormality. Missing a clear fracture on an X ray, overlooking a critical value on a blood test, or misreading a CT scan showing internal bleeding can lead to improper treatment or a patient being sent home when they actually need urgent care. These mistakes often occur when providers are fatigued or when communication breaks down (for instance, if a radiologist’s report isn’t reviewed promptly).

From a legal standpoint, misreading or ignoring test results is a breach of the standard of care for example, misreading an X ray or CT such that a serious condition goes undiagnosed is a clear deviation from what a competent doctor would do. While an “official” radiologist’s reading is typically expected, ER physicians have a duty to catch obvious problems on scans and labs. If they don’t, and the patient is harmed, it’s negligence.

Systemic Failures: When the Hospital Itself Is Negligent

Sometimes, an injury in the ER isn’t just the fault of a single doctor or nurse. The hospital’s own policies and environment can set the stage for disaster. In Florida, hospitals can be held liable for administrative or systemic failures that create a dangerous environment for patients. Some ways a hospital’s negligence can contribute to ER malpractice include:

Understaffing and Overcrowding

When an emergency room is severely understaffed, the quality of care inevitably suffers. One nurse might be responsible for too many critical patients, vital signs get missed, and doctors have no time to thoroughly evaluate each case. Overcrowding often leads to “boarding” patients being kept on gurneys in hallways for hours or days due to lack of beds. In such conditions, even attentive staff can miss important changes in a patient’s condition.

Florida hospitals are expected to maintain adequate staffing and patient flow. If your injury was caused by a clear lack of sufficient personnel to handle the patient volume, the hospital itself may be on the hook. Hospital administrators who allow chronic understaffing or overcrowding are breaching their duty to provide a safe environment. In other words, the institution can be found negligent for creating conditions where mistakes become inevitable.

Lack of Proper Protocols

Hospitals are required to have clear procedures for handling common emergencies for example, a stroke protocol or a heart attack (STEMI) protocol that ER staff should follow to ensure timely care. If a hospital lacks these critical protocols, or if it fails to train its staff to follow them, patients can slip through the cracks. For instance, there are well established standards for stroke care (often summarized as “time is brain”) and heart attack care (“time is muscle”).

A hospital that doesn’t implement these standards say, not having a policy to administer clot busting medication for strokes within a certain timeframe, or no system to activate a cath lab team for an incoming heart attack can be found negligent at the corporate level.

In Florida, healthcare facilities have a duty to establish proper procedures and risk management practices to protect patients. A hospital’s systemic negligence (like not having a protocol, or not enforcing it) can be just as harmful as an individual doctor’s mistake.

Communication Breakdowns

Effective care in the ER relies on clear communication between doctors, nurses, lab technicians, and specialists. If a critical piece of information gets lost during a shift change, or if test results aren’t conveyed to the treating physician in time, the ball gets dropped on patient care. These kinds of systemic communication failures are often due to faulty hospital systems for example, a glitchy electronic health record that doesn’t flag abnormal results, or poor hand off procedures between shifts. When such failures lead to harm, the hospital may bear responsibility.

For instance, if lab results indicating sepsis sit unnoticed because the system didn’t alert the nurse, or a patient’s deteriorating vital signs aren’t passed on to the next shift, those are system failures. From a legal perspective, if the hospital’s communication processes (or lack thereof) caused the delay or error in treatment, the institution can be held liable.

Even if the individual providers were doing their best, a broken system can be negligent. In one example, delays in treatment have been traced to test results not being communicated or follow up actions not being scheduled clearly a breakdown that can form the basis of a claim. Hospitals must ensure that information flows properly; when they don’t, patients suffer, and the law can hold the facility accountable.

Emergency room doctor in blue scrubs reviewing X-ray while examining male patient experiencing chest pain in hospital bed, with medical staff and equipment visible in busy ER background

If you believe you were a victim of emergency room malpractice, Florida law requires you to follow a specific pre suit process before you can file a lawsuit. Medical malpractice claims are complex, and the state has procedures in place to screen out frivolous cases. Here’s an overview of the steps involved in pursuing an ER malpractice claim in Florida:

Investigation and Expert Review

The first step is to consult an attorney and launch a thorough investigation of your case. Your lawyer will obtain all relevant medical records from your ER visit (and any follow up care) and have them reviewed by a qualified medical expert typically another emergency physician or specialist in the same field as your injury. Florida law actually mandates this expert review: an attorney must have a sworn affidavit from a medical expert stating that the care you received fell below the professional standard of care and caused your injuries before filing a claim.

This means your case needs a doctor’s certification that, in their opinion, malpractice likely occurred. This investigative phase may also involve interviewing witnesses, reviewing hospital policies, and building a timeline of exactly what happened in the ER. Only if the expert agrees that your care was substandard will the process move forward.

Notice of Intent (Pre-Suit Notification)

Once an expert has corroborated your claim, your attorney will serve a Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation on all potential defendants. This is essentially a letter that notifies the doctor, hospital, or other providers that you intend to file a malpractice lawsuit, and it includes the expert’s affidavit and a summary of the claim. Under Florida Statutes, after this Notice is delivered, there is a mandatory 90 day waiting period before you can file a lawsuit. During this 90 day pre suit period, the medical providers (and their insurance companies) will conduct their own internal investigation of the claim.

They may request interviews or additional medical exams, which your attorney will navigate with you. The idea is to encourage settlement discussions or dispute resolution before involving the courts. By the end of the 90 days, the hospital or doctor must respond to your Notice of Intent. They can either: deny liability, offer to settle, or in some cases propose arbitration. No lawsuit can be filed during this 90 day window unless the defendant formally rejects the claim earlier. This built in pause can be frustrating when you’re seeking justice, but it’s a required step in Florida malpractice cases.

Filing a Lawsuit

If the pre suit period concludes without a satisfactory resolution (for example, if the providers deny the claim or negotiations fail to reach a settlement), your attorney can then file a formal medical malpractice lawsuit in court. This filing must include a certification that you complied with the pre suit requirements. Once in court, the case enters the standard litigation process: both sides engage in discovery (exchanging documents, taking depositions of witnesses and experts, etc.), and the defendants will formally respond to your allegations.

Medical malpractice cases often involve dueling expert witnesses your expert who says the ER was negligent, and the defense experts who may argue that the care was acceptable or that something else caused the injury. The case may still settle at any point if the hospital or doctor decides to offer compensation, but if not, it could proceed to trial for a jury to decide.

It’s important to act quickly and deliberately during this phase, because Florida has a strict statute of limitations for medical malpractice. In general, you have two years from the date you knew (or should have known through reasonable diligence) that malpractice occurred to file your lawsuit. In no event can a malpractice claim be filed more than four years from the date of the actual incident (this outer deadline is known as the “statute of repose”), unless an exception applies such as fraud or intentional concealment by the provider. Two years can pass quickly when you’re dealing with the aftermath of a medical injury, so engaging a lawyer as soon as you suspect negligence is crucial. Missing the deadline, unfortunately, means you lose your right to sue, no matter how strong your case might be.

(Note: There are special rules if the patient is a minor, or if the injured person was mentally incapacitated, which can extend the time to file in some instances. An experienced Florida malpractice attorney can advise on any applicable exceptions. But the safest approach is to assume the clock is ticking from the moment you discover the injury.)

You Deserve a Standard of Care, Even in an Emergency

The chaotic nature of an emergency room is not an excuse for negligence. Every patient has the right to expect a basic standard of care that protects them from preventable harm even when the ER is overflowing and the staff is under pressure. If a harmful delay or a careless mistake by ER personnel has left you or a loved one seriously injured, you deserve answers and accountability.

Pursuing a malpractice claim can seem daunting, especially while recovering from trauma, but it’s often the only way to get justice and compensation for what you’ve endured. An experienced Florida medical malpractice attorney can guide you through the process: investigating what went wrong, navigating the complex pre suit requirements, and fighting for the compensation you need to rebuild your life.

Taking legal action not only helps you and your family; it also holds hospitals and providers accountable to the community. When a hospital is forced to confront its failures, it can lead to changes that prevent similar tragedies from happening to others. Your case could prompt an ER to improve its triage procedures, hire adequate staff, or enforce better communication protocols making the system safer for future patients.

In the end, seeking accountability is about more than money; it’s about shining a light on substandard care and demanding better. In the chaos of an emergency, we as patients rely on care to prevail. When the system falls short, the law provides a pathway to set things right. You are not alone help is available, and you have the right to answers and recourse when emergency room care fails the people it’s meant to save.

Attorney Bio: Jorge L. Flores, Florida Bar No. 53244, has been representing families in Miami Dade for over 30 years.

Disclaimer: This overview is general information, not legal advice. Deadlines and procedures can change based on facts and parties. For guidance on your specific situation, contact a Florida medical malpractice attorney.

Book Your Appointment

Contact Form Demo