{"id":2517,"date":"2026-04-21T17:11:04","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T17:11:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/floreslawmiami.com\/?p=2517"},"modified":"2026-04-22T04:23:25","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T04:23:25","slug":"negligencia-medica-acuerdo-medio-florida","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/floreslawmiami.com\/es\/medical-malpractice-average-settlement-florida\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es la indemnizaci\u00f3n media por una demanda por negligencia m\u00e9dica en Florida?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\r\n
Home<\/a> \/<\/span> Medical Malpractice<\/a> \/<\/span> Average Settlement<\/span><\/div>\r\n
Last updated April 21, 2026<\/span><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

What Is the Average Settlement for a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Florida?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\"Jorge<\/figure>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\r\n\r\n\n
\n\n
\r\n
REVIEWED BY<\/div>\r\n
Jorge L. Flores, Esq.<\/a> · Florida Bar No. 53244<\/span><\/div>\r\n
Former hospital defense attorney · Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A. · Bar verification<\/a><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\r\n
<\/span><\/span>~18 min read<\/span><\/div>\r\n
|<\/div>\r\n
20 injury types covered<\/div>\r\n
|<\/div>\r\n
9 FL judicial circuits<\/div>\r\n
|<\/div>\r\n
Interactive calculator<\/div>\r\n
|<\/div>\r\n
2026 FLOIR data<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\r\n
\r\n
NPDB AVERAGE<\/div>\r\n
$371,000<\/div>\r\n
Individual practitioner payments (2025)<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
FLOIR AVERAGE<\/div>\r\n
$551,189<\/div>\r\n
All FL claims, inflation-adjusted to 2026<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
HIGHEST CATEGORY<\/div>\r\n
$2,737,530<\/div>\r\n
Cerebral palsy (FLOIR, 2026 $)<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\r\n
AT A GLANCE · FLORIDA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE SETTLEMENTS 2026<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n\r\n
\r\n
AVERAGE SETTLEMENT<\/div>\r\n
$371K (NPDB)<\/strong> to $551K (FLOIR)<\/strong><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
MEDIAN (TYPICAL)<\/div>\r\n
$97,500 to $250,000<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
MOST COMMON RANGE<\/div>\r\n
$250K to $499K (28.6% of cases)<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
NON-ECONOMIC CAP<\/div>\r\n
None (private sector, since 2017)<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
PUBLIC HOSPITAL CAP<\/div>\r\n
$200K per person \/ $300K per incident<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS<\/div>\r\n
2 years from discovery; 4-year repose<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
CASES THAT REACH TRIAL<\/div>\r\n
Approximately 4%<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
SETTLEMENT RATE<\/div>\r\n
68% of claims are paid<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\r\n

T<\/span>he average medical malpractice settlement in Florida ranges from approximately $371,000 to $551,189<\/strong>, depending on which government dataset is used to answer the question. The lower figure comes from the National Practitioner Data Bank, which tracks payments made on behalf of individual licensed practitioners; the higher figure comes from the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Professional Liability Closed Claims database, which captures a much broader universe of cases that includes hospitals, health systems, and institutional defendants across 52,932 closed claims spanning 1994 through 2026, inflation-adjusted to 2026 dollars.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

It is significant to note that the “average” figure is almost always higher than the “median” figure, because a relatively small number of catastrophic cases, such as severe brain injuries, cerebral palsy, and quadriplegia, skew the mathematical average upward; the typical Florida medical malpractice settlement, measured at the median, is closer to $250,000 to $310,000 for most injury categories.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n

Florida law critically affects these numbers.<\/strong> Since the Florida Supreme Court decisions in Estate of McCall v. United States<\/em> (2014) and North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan<\/em> (2017), there is no enforceable cap on non-economic damages in private-sector Florida medical malpractice cases; public hospitals and state-employed physicians remain subject to Florida’s sovereign immunity caps under Section 768.28. The statute of limitations under Section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes requires filing within two years of discovering the injury, with a four-year statute of repose.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n

“When an adjuster quotes ‘the average settlement,’ always ask whether they mean the mean or the median. The two numbers produce very different negotiation leverage, and most clients have never been told the difference.”<\/p>\r\n

— JORGE L. FLORES, ESQ.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
PART 1 OF 4 · THE HEADLINE NUMBERS<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\r\n
ON THIS PAGE<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
01<\/span> Quick Facts<\/a><\/div>\r\n
02<\/span> Why Numbers Differ<\/a><\/div>\r\n
03<\/span> By Injury Type<\/a><\/div>\r\n
04<\/span> By Severity Level<\/a><\/div>\r\n
05<\/span> By Provider Type<\/a><\/div>\r\n
06<\/span> National Comparison<\/a><\/div>\r\n
07<\/span> No-Cap Environment<\/a><\/div>\r\n
08<\/span> Sovereign Immunity<\/a><\/div>\r\n
09<\/span> Wrongful Death Standing<\/a><\/div>\r\n
10<\/span> Punitive Damages<\/a><\/div>\r\n
11<\/span> Judicial Circuits<\/a><\/div>\r\n
12<\/span> Pre-Suit vs. Litigated<\/a><\/div>\r\n
13<\/span> Myth vs. Reality<\/a><\/div>\r\n
14<\/span> Nine Value Factors<\/a><\/div>\r\n
15<\/span> By Malpractice Type<\/a><\/div>\r\n
16<\/span> Historical Trend<\/a><\/div>\r\n
17<\/span> Settlement Estimator<\/a><\/div>\r\n
18<\/span> Landmark Verdicts<\/a><\/div>\r\n
19<\/span> FAQ<\/a><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Florida Medical Malpractice Settlement Quick Facts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The following table consolidates the most frequently cited figures across the two authoritative government datasets that track medical malpractice payments in Florida; these figures represent settlements and verdicts that resulted in payment to the injured party or their family, and they do not include the substantial number of cases that are dismissed, withdrawn, or resolved without any monetary recovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Metric<\/th>\r\nAmount<\/th>\r\nSource<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
NPDB Average Payout (2025)<\/strong><\/td>$371,000<\/td>National Practitioner Data Bank<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
FLOIR Inflation-Adjusted Average (2026 $)<\/strong><\/td>$551,189<\/td>FL Office of Insurance Regulation<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Median (Typical Settlement)<\/strong><\/td>$97,500 to $250,000<\/td>NPDB \/ FLOIR range<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Most Common Settlement Range<\/strong><\/td>$250,000 to $499,999 (28.6%)<\/td>NPDB 2015-2025<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Settlement Rate<\/strong><\/td>68% of claims are paid<\/td>FLOIR<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Florida’s National Ranking<\/strong><\/td>#2 to #3 total payouts<\/td>NPDB 2025<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Cases Proceeding to Trial<\/strong><\/td>Approximately 4%<\/td>FLOIR<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Non-Economic Damages Cap<\/strong><\/td>None (private sector)<\/td>Kalitan<\/em>, 2017<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Sovereign Immunity Cap<\/strong><\/td>$200K per person \/ $300K per incident<\/td>\u00a7768.28<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Punitive Damages Cap<\/strong><\/td>3x compensatory or $500,000<\/td>\u00a7768.73<\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

Sources: National Practitioner Data Bank (HRSA); Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Professional Liability Closed Claims Database; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Medical Care Services CPI.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Why Settlement Numbers Differ Across Sources<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Anyone researching Florida medical malpractice settlements quickly encounters a confusing reality: different authoritative sources report dramatically different “average” numbers for the same jurisdiction in the same year. The confusion is not random; it reflects a real methodological difference in what each database actually measures, and understanding that difference is the single most important step in developing a realistic expectation of what your own case may be worth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The National Practitioner Data Bank, or NPDB, tracks only payments made on behalf of individual licensed practitioners<\/strong>, which means physicians, nurse practitioners, dentists, and other named individuals whose conduct is being reported to a federal medical-licensing database. The NPDB does not capture the full universe of medical malpractice payments, because it specifically excludes institutional settlements paid by hospitals, health systems, and corporate medical entities that are not tied to an individual practitioner’s license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, or FLOIR, uses a broader and more complete dataset.<\/strong> The Professional Liability Closed Claims database collects reports on every medical malpractice claim closed in Florida, irrespective of whether the defendant was an individual practitioner or an institutional entity such as a hospital, surgery center, or corporate health system; this broader population produces a meaningfully higher average because institutional defendants carry substantially larger insurance policies and settle catastrophic cases for substantially larger sums.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

\u26a1 IT IS SIGNIFICANT TO NOTE<\/p>\r\n

The gap between the average<\/em> settlement ($371,000 NPDB, or $551,189 FLOIR) and the median<\/em> settlement (approximately $97,500 to $250,000) exists because only about 2.7% of Florida medical malpractice cases produce payouts above $1 million; those catastrophic outliers dramatically inflate the arithmetic mean, while the typical settlement sits much lower. When an insurance adjuster or defense attorney quotes “the average,” ask whether they are citing the mean or the median; the two numbers produce very different negotiation leverage.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

For context, the national average NPDB payout in 2025 was $457,362, which places Florida’s $371,000 NPDB average below the national average at the practitioner level; at the institutional level, however, Florida ranks among the top three states in total medical malpractice payouts annually, behind only New York and Pennsylvania. This divergence, where Florida is below-average at the individual practitioner level but near the top at the institutional level, is one of the most misunderstood features of Florida’s medical malpractice landscape, and it has meaningful consequences for how a case should be valued and against whom it should be brought.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
PART 2 OF 4 · BREAKING DOWN THE DATA<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Average Settlement by Injury Type in Florida (20 Categories)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The injury sustained is the single strongest predictor of medical malpractice settlement value; two cases involving identical acts of negligence can produce settlements that differ by a factor of ten or more, depending on whether the resulting injury was a temporary fracture or a permanent catastrophic brain injury. The table below is drawn from the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Professional Liability Closed Claims database and represents inflation-adjusted 2026 dollars across all 52,932 closed claims in the dataset.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Injury Type<\/th>\r\nAverage<\/th>\r\nRelative Magnitude<\/th>\r\nTypical<\/th>\r\nClaims<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
Cerebral Palsy<\/td>$2,737,530<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$323,750<\/td>218<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Grave Permanent (Quadriplegia\/Severe Brain Damage)<\/td>$2,097,593<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$588,402<\/td>—<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Brain Damage<\/td>$1,791,149<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$447,250<\/td>799<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Hypoxic\/Anoxic Brain Injury<\/td>$1,680,256<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$411,750<\/td>893<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Quadriplegia<\/td>$1,508,467<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$633,600<\/td>163<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Pulmonary Embolism<\/td>$1,466,166<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$323,750<\/td>513<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Paralysis<\/td>$1,234,173<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$396,000<\/td>382<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Paraplegia<\/td>$1,204,945<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$500,000<\/td>273<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Sepsis<\/td>$995,300<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$296,545<\/td>1,204<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Stroke<\/td>$920,616<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$360,750<\/td>937<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Hemorrhage \/ Major Bleeding<\/td>$858,284<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$274,500<\/td>1,347<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Spinal Cord Injury<\/td>$839,062<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$371,865<\/td>304<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Amputation \/ Loss of Limb<\/td>$828,980<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$290,750<\/td>762<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Cardiac Arrest \/ Heart Attack<\/td>$822,343<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$347,250<\/td>1,149<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Blindness \/ Vision Loss<\/td>$813,920<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$323,750<\/td>331<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Infection (Hospital-Acquired)<\/td>$713,894<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$168,400<\/td>1,606<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Permanent Significant Injury<\/td>$622,614<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$327,200<\/td>—<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Wrongful Death<\/td>$618,561<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$306,300<\/td>6,979<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Nerve Damage<\/td>$349,166<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$209,425<\/td>740<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Fracture<\/td>$253,635<\/td>
<\/div><\/td>
$128,205<\/td>1,871<\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

Source: Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Professional Liability Closed Claims (1994-2026), inflation-adjusted to 2026 dollars using the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Medical Care Services CPI. Magnitude bars are relative to the highest value in the table.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The data reveals a pattern that holds consistently across all injury categories: the average settlement figure is substantially higher than the median, which means most cases settle for far less than the headline “average” number suggests, while a smaller number of catastrophic cases settle for multiples of the average. A family researching a cerebral palsy case, for example, should understand that while the average Florida cerebral palsy settlement is $2,737,530, the typical (median) settlement is $323,750; the difference reflects the fact that a small number of cases involving lifetime institutional care and severe cognitive impairment settle in the seven- and eight-figure range, while many cases involving less severe outcomes settle for substantially less.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Average Settlement by Severity Level in Florida<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Florida’s closed claims database classifies every case into one of nine severity tiers, a framework that mirrors the National Association of Insurance Commissioners severity scale used across the medical malpractice insurance industry. The severity classification captures not just what went wrong, but the lasting consequence of what went wrong, which is ultimately what drives settlement value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Severity Level<\/th>\r\nAverage (2026 $)<\/th>\r\nTypical<\/th>\r\nSettlement Rate<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
Grave Permanent (quadriplegia, severe brain damage)<\/td>$2,097,593<\/td>$588,402<\/td>76%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Permanent Major (paraplegia, blindness, loss of 2 limbs)<\/td>$1,372,807<\/td>$421,000<\/td>64%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Wrongful Death<\/td>$622,810<\/td>$309,750<\/td>70%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Permanent Significant (loss of limb, eye, kidney)<\/td>$622,614<\/td>$327,200<\/td>72%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Permanent Minor (loss of fingers, organ damage)<\/td>$337,589<\/td>$207,387<\/td>69%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Temporary Major<\/td>$294,540<\/td>$154,875<\/td>71%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Emotional Injury Only<\/td>$181,113<\/td>$18,620<\/td>50%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Temporary Minor<\/td>$135,645<\/td>$71,325<\/td>67%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Temporary Slight<\/td>$72,671<\/td>$27,660<\/td>62%<\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Average Settlement by Provider Type in Florida<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The identity of the defendant in a Florida medical malpractice case materially affects settlement value, because hospitals, individual physicians, emergency rooms, and nursing facilities carry very different insurance coverage structures and very different risk profiles. A claim brought against a large hospital system is typically valued higher than a claim brought against an individual physician for the same injury, because the hospital carries substantially larger insurance policies, faces institutional reputation exposure in the event of a trial, and has access to settlement authority that individual practitioners simply do not possess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

PROVIDER TYPE DIFFERENTIALS<\/p>\r\n

\r\n
Hospital \/ Health System:<\/strong> averages approximately 35% more than individual practitioner cases. Hospitals carry higher policy limits and settle catastrophic cases for substantially larger sums.<\/div>\r\n
Emergency Room:<\/strong> averages approximately 20% more than individual physician cases. ER cases often involve multiple defendants and accelerated decision-making that is difficult to defend.<\/div>\r\n
Individual Physician:<\/strong> typical policy limits range from $250,000 to $1,000,000 per claim. These limits function as a practical ceiling unless the physician has significant personal assets.<\/div>\r\n
Nursing Cases:<\/strong> average approximately 15% less than individual physician cases. Nursing professional liability policies carry lower coverage limits.<\/div>\r\n
Institutional Policy Limits:<\/strong> most large Florida hospital systems carry primary and excess coverage in the tens of millions of dollars.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

How Florida Compares to Other States<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A common question among clients researching their case is whether Florida, as a state without an enforceable cap on non-economic damages in private-sector cases, produces higher settlements than states that do have such caps. The answer is more nuanced than many online sources suggest, and the 2025 NPDB data shows that Florida occupies an interesting middle ground; Florida generates large total payouts because of the sheer volume of medical care provided in the state, but the average per-claim payout at the practitioner level is actually lower than several other large-state peers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
State<\/th>\r\nTotal Payouts (2025)<\/th>\r\nClaims<\/th>\r\nAvg. \/ Claim<\/th>\r\nDamage Cap<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
New York<\/td>$372.4M<\/td>659<\/td>$565,077<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Illinois<\/td>$112.3M<\/td>164<\/td>$684,776<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Pennsylvania<\/td>$188.9M<\/td>456<\/td>$414,276<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Florida<\/strong><\/td>$203.9M<\/strong><\/td>670<\/strong><\/td>$304,253<\/strong><\/td>None (since 2017)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>\r\n
California<\/td>$162.9M<\/td>513<\/td>$317,447<\/td>$350K to $750K<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Texas<\/td>$76.1M<\/td>344<\/td>$221,101<\/td>$250K to $500K<\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

Source: National Practitioner Data Bank, 2025 annual report.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

THE FLORIDA PARADOX<\/p>\r\n

Despite having no enforceable cap on non-economic damages in the private sector, Florida’s NPDB average payout ($304,253) is notably lower than cap-free peers such as New York ($565,077) and Illinois ($684,776); a significant reason for this is that Florida’s mandatory pre-suit investigation period<\/a> under Section 766.106 of the Florida Statutes filters out weaker cases before they are ever filed, which suppresses total case volume while shifting the mix toward higher-quality, higher-value claims. The cases that clear the pre-suit hurdle and reach settlement are, on average, substantively stronger than the national baseline.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n

“Florida’s legal landscape is unusual. There is no cap on non-economic damages in private-sector cases, but sovereign immunity can reduce the same case to $200,000 against a public hospital. Which defendant you sue often matters more than how badly you were hurt.”<\/p>\r\n

— JORGE L. FLORES, ESQ.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
PART 3 OF 4 · FLORIDA LAW & LIMITS<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

How Florida’s No-Cap Environment Affects Settlement Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For many years Florida imposed statutory caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases under Section 766.118 of the Florida Statutes, and those caps, which ranged from $500,000 to $1,500,000 depending on the circumstances, functioned as a practical ceiling on what an injured patient or grieving family could recover for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other non-economic losses. That regime no longer exists in enforceable form for private-sector defendants, and the change has meaningful consequences for settlement negotiations and trial strategy in Florida medical malpractice cases today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

FLORIDA STATUTE \u00a7 766.118<\/p>\r\n

Non-economic damages caps for medical malpractice.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Remains on the books as written, but is unenforceable following the Florida Supreme Court’s decisions in Estate of McCall v. United States<\/em> (2014) and North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan<\/em> (2017), which held the statutory caps unconstitutional under the Florida Constitution’s equal protection clause. There is currently no enforceable cap on non-economic damages in private-sector Florida medical malpractice cases; public hospitals and state-employed providers remain subject to separate sovereign immunity limits under Section 768.28, discussed below.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The 2025-2026 Legislative Landscape<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The legislative environment is in active flux, and any client researching their Florida medical malpractice case in 2026 should understand what has happened in the past eighteen months and what may happen in the coming session. In May 2025, Governor Ron DeSantis vetoed House Bill 6017<\/strong>, a wrongful death reform bill that would have expanded the class of family members entitled to recover non-economic damages in Florida medical malpractice wrongful death cases; the Governor’s veto message called for the enactment of new caps on non-economic damages as a condition of any expansion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In November 2025, the Florida House Judiciary Committee passed House Bill 6003 by a vote of 15 to 1<\/strong>; HB 6003 is a narrower reintroduction of the wrongful death reform concept, focused specifically on adult child and parent wrongful death claims, and it is being tracked closely in the 2026 legislative session. Senate Bill 248<\/strong>, also filed for the 2026 session, would re-impose a $750,000 cap on non-economic damages across Florida medical malpractice cases; SB 248 has not yet received a committee hearing as of April 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

\u26a0 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ALERT<\/p>\r\n

Florida Section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes requires that a medical malpractice action be filed within two years of the date the injury was discovered, or should have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence<\/strong>, subject to a four-year statute of repose measured from the date of the incident itself. The failure to file within these windows is almost always fatal to the claim, irrespective of its underlying merits. Read our full overview of Florida medical malpractice law<\/a> for the narrow exceptions that may apply.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Sovereign Immunity and Public Hospital Caps<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the most consequential, and least-understood, features of Florida medical malpractice law is that an entirely different set of damage limits applies when the defendant is a public hospital, a state-employed physician, a county health department, or another governmental entity. Florida’s sovereign immunity statute, Section 768.28 of the Florida Statutes, caps total recovery against such entities regardless of the severity of the injury, the clarity of the negligence, or the economic damages sustained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

\u26a0 \u00a7768.28 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY CAPS<\/p>\r\n

\r\n
• $200,000 per person<\/strong> for any single claim or judgment against a governmental entity<\/div>\r\n
• $300,000 per incident<\/strong> aggregate total across all claims arising from the same occurrence<\/div>\r\n
• Claims bill required<\/strong> for any recovery above the statutory caps, which requires passage by the Florida Legislature and signature by the Governor<\/div>\r\n
• Applies to:<\/strong> state-operated hospitals, county health departments, public teaching hospitals such as Jackson Memorial, state university medical schools, and physicians employed by such entities<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The practical consequence is stark: a cerebral palsy case valued at $2,737,530 against a private-sector defendant may be capped at $200,000 against Jackson Memorial Hospital, the University of Florida Health system, or a state-employed obstetrician; the difference is not a reflection of the merits of the case but a function of who employs the defendant. This is why the early identification of the defendant’s employment status, and the existence of alternative non-governmental defendants such as private medical groups providing services within public hospitals, is among the most consequential strategic decisions in the early phase of a Florida medical malpractice case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cases that exceed the sovereign immunity caps may be pursued through the Florida Legislature’s claims bill process under Section 768.28(5); this process requires the injured party to lobby the Legislature to pass a special act authorizing payment above the statutory limits. Claims bills are inherently political, they can take years to pass, and they are by no means guaranteed; the existence of a claims bill pathway does not eliminate the sovereign immunity cap as a practical barrier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida’s Wrongful Death Standing Restriction (The “Only State” Rule)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Florida is currently the only state in the United States that categorically bars certain surviving family members from recovering non-economic damages in medical malpractice wrongful death cases. Under Section 768.21(8) of the Florida Statutes, commonly called the Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Standing Restriction, the adult children of a decedent who was killed by medical malpractice cannot recover non-economic damages for the loss of their parent<\/strong>, and the parents of a decedent who was an adult at the time of death cannot recover non-economic damages for the loss of their adult child, if the decedent was unmarried and without minor children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

\u26a0 WHO IS AFFECTED BY THE STANDING RESTRICTION<\/p>\r\n

\r\n
• Adult children of unmarried decedents<\/strong> with no surviving minor children cannot recover for loss of parental companionship<\/div>\r\n
• Parents of adult decedents<\/strong> who were unmarried and had no minor children cannot recover for mental pain and suffering<\/div>\r\n
• Applies only to medical malpractice wrongful death claims<\/strong>; not to other wrongful death categories such as car accidents or premises liability, where these family members retain full standing<\/div>\r\n
• Effect on case value:<\/strong> often reduces the potential recovery in otherwise meritorious cases by several hundred thousand to several million dollars<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The standing restriction has been the subject of intensive legislative reform efforts. As discussed above, Governor DeSantis vetoed House Bill 6017 in May 2025, which would have eliminated the restriction; House Bill 6003, passed 15 to 1 by the House Judiciary Committee in November 2025, represents a narrower second attempt. Until either bill becomes law, the standing restriction remains in effect, and Florida remains the only state in which an adult child whose parent was killed by obvious medical negligence may be left without any non-economic recovery whatsoever if the parent had no spouse and no minor children at the time of death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For families evaluating a Florida medical malpractice wrongful death case<\/a>, the standing analysis is among the first questions experienced counsel will address; the identity of the surviving family members and their relationship to the decedent materially affects whether the case can economically be pursued at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Punitive Damages in Florida Medical Malpractice Cases<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Punitive damages, which are designed to punish particularly egregious conduct and deter similar conduct in the future, are available in Florida medical malpractice cases but are both procedurally difficult to obtain and statutorily capped. Under Section 768.73 of the Florida Statutes, a claimant must first secure permission from the court to assert a punitive damages claim by making a proffer of evidence sufficient to establish a reasonable basis for recovery of such damages; Section 768.72 requires a showing by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in intentional misconduct or gross negligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n

\u00a7768.73 PUNITIVE DAMAGES CAP<\/p>\r\n

Florida limits punitive damages to the greater of three times the compensatory damages award, or $500,000<\/strong>, subject to two statutory exceptions:<\/p>\r\n

\r\n
• Four times compensatory or $2,000,000<\/strong> when the conduct was motivated by unreasonable financial gain and senior management knew of the unreasonably dangerous nature of the conduct<\/div>\r\n
• No cap<\/strong> when the conduct was specifically intended to harm the claimant<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

In medical malpractice practice, punitive damages are rarely recovered and should not be assumed as part of the settlement valuation. The most common fact patterns that support punitive damages claims include the deliberate falsification of medical records to conceal negligence, the operation of a physician practice while the physician is impaired, and the continuation of dangerous practices after multiple prior incidents have been reported. The presence of credible punitive damages exposure can meaningfully accelerate settlement negotiations because defendants and their insurance carriers prefer not to have egregious conduct ventilated at trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida Judicial Circuit Settlement Differentials: Actual Dollar Figures<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A question that appears nowhere else on the first page of search results, but which materially affects medical malpractice settlement value in Florida, is whether the case is being brought in Miami-Dade County versus Jacksonville versus the Panhandle. The answer is yes; settlement values vary substantially across Florida’s twenty judicial circuits. The figures below are derived from FLOIR closed claims data and represent the inflation-adjusted 2026-dollar average settlement across all injury categories within each circuit, with the statewide baseline shown for comparison.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Judicial Circuit<\/th>\r\nAvg. Settlement<\/th>\r\nvs. Baseline<\/th>\r\nDriving Factor<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
Miami-Dade (11th)<\/a><\/td>$712,540<\/td>+29%<\/span><\/td>Dense plaintiff bar; large hospital defendants<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Broward (17th)<\/td>$661,426<\/td>+20%<\/span><\/td>Litigation culture similar to Miami-Dade<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Palm Beach (15th)<\/td>$625,852<\/td>+14%<\/span><\/td>High-value jury awards; hospital litigation<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Orange \/ Orlando (9th)<\/td>$579,950<\/td>+5%<\/span><\/td>Hospital density; growing plaintiff bar<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
BASELINE ·<\/span> Florida Statewide<\/td>$551,189<\/td>—<\/td>FLOIR inflation-adjusted baseline<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Hillsborough \/ Tampa (13th)<\/td>$524,630<\/td>-5%<\/span><\/td>Major defendants offset by defense-favorable juries<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Pinellas (6th)<\/td>$486,750<\/td>-12%<\/span><\/td>Older jury pool; moderate hospital presence<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Duval \/ Jacksonville (4th)<\/td>$441,050<\/td>-20%<\/span><\/td>Historically conservative jury pool<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
Escambia \/ Pensacola (1st)<\/td>$391,348<\/td>-29%<\/span><\/td>Lowest statewide; rural Panhandle venue<\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

Source: FLOIR Professional Liability Closed Claims, circuit-level analysis (1994-2026), inflation-adjusted to 2026 dollars.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The spread between the highest-valued circuit (Miami-Dade, $712,540) and the lowest-valued circuit (Escambia, $391,348) exceeds $320,000 per average case, which is why experienced Florida medical malpractice counsel will carefully evaluate venue early in every matter; in many fact patterns, multiple Florida circuits have proper venue under Chapter 47 of the Florida Statutes, and the choice of venue can shift the expected settlement value by a substantial margin. From our offices in Miami, Florida, the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., represents injured patients throughout the entire State of Florida, with particular familiarity with the South Florida circuits where the largest medical malpractice verdicts in the state are consistently produced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pre-Suit vs. Litigated Settlement Data<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A persistent myth in Florida medical malpractice practice is that injured patients must be prepared to go to trial in order to recover meaningful compensation; the FLOIR data refutes this directly. The average pre-suit settlement in Florida, meaning a settlement reached during the mandatory 90-day investigation period under Section 766.106 of the Florida Statutes and before a formal lawsuit is filed, is approximately $519,194; the average litigated settlement, meaning a case that proceeded into active litigation before resolving, is approximately $561,600. The difference is modest, and the overwhelming majority of Florida medical malpractice cases resolve without a trial at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n
\r\n
PRE-SUIT SETTLEMENTS<\/div>\r\n
$519,194<\/div>\r\n
Average settlement reached during the mandatory 90-day pre-suit investigation period under Section 766.106. Across the FLOIR dataset, 8,866 cases<\/strong> settled at this stage.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
LITIGATED SETTLEMENTS<\/div>\r\n
$561,600<\/div>\r\n
Average settlement for cases that proceeded into active litigation after the pre-suit period concluded. Only about 4%<\/strong> of Florida medical malpractice cases proceed all the way to trial.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The implication for clients is significant: filing a well-prepared medical malpractice claim, and doing so with counsel who have invested in the expert work necessary to pass the mandatory pre-suit corroboration requirement, is enough to produce settlement leverage comparable to what a litigated case produces. At the Law Offices of Jorge L. Flores, P.A., the preparation that happens before any complaint is ever filed is treated as the single most consequential phase of a Florida medical malpractice case, and that investment is what produces favorable settlements during the pre-suit window. Read our detailed overview of Florida medical malpractice law<\/a> to understand what the 90-day window requires and how it is used strategically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Myth vs. Reality: Common Misconceptions About Florida Medical Malpractice Settlements<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Clients researching their options frequently arrive at an initial consultation carrying one or more of the assumptions below, each of which materially distorts the settlement evaluation process; the corrections that follow reflect both the statutory framework and the practical experience of negotiating Florida medical malpractice cases with the insurance carriers and defense firms that regularly appear in these matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n
\r\n
MYTH<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

“The average settlement is what my case will get.”<\/p>\r\n

REALITY<\/p>\r\n

The “average” is dragged upward by catastrophic outlier cases. The median (typical) settlement is frequently one-third to one-half of the headline average. Your case will be valued on its specific facts; the statewide average is a reference point, not a prediction.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n

\r\n
MYTH<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

“Signing the consent form means I waived my right to sue.”<\/p>\r\n

REALITY<\/p>\r\n

An informed consent form disclaims liability for the known risks of a procedure when those risks materialize despite proper care. It does not, and cannot, waive liability for medical negligence; a surgeon who deviates from the standard of care remains legally responsible regardless of what consent form the patient signed.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n

\r\n
MYTH<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

“A bad outcome means I have a case.”<\/p>\r\n

REALITY<\/p>\r\n

It is significant to note that not all bad outcomes are by any means the result of medical errors or malpractice. Florida law requires the claimant to prove a deviation from the professional standard of care by competent medical expert testimony, and to prove that the deviation caused the injury.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n

\r\n
MYTH<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

“I have to go to trial to get a fair settlement.”<\/p>\r\n

REALITY<\/p>\r\n

Only about 4% of Florida medical malpractice cases reach a jury verdict. The average pre-suit settlement ($519,194) and the average litigated settlement ($561,600) are comparable; what matters is preparation, not courtroom theatrics.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n

\r\n
MYTH<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

“The insurance company will offer a fair amount early.”<\/p>\r\n

REALITY<\/p>\r\n

The insurance company will oftentimes attempt to settle the claim quickly, which almost always results in an amount that significantly undervalues the true cost of the injuries sustained; early offers are designed to resolve the claim before the full scope of future medical care has been properly quantified by experts.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
PART 4 OF 4 · VALUE DRIVERS & TOOLS<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Nine Factors That Drive Your Florida Settlement Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Medical malpractice settlement value is not determined by a single input, and any attorney or calculator that suggests otherwise is oversimplifying a complex evaluation. The nine factors below, derived from the FLOIR data and from the negotiating experience of Florida medical malpractice counsel, each independently affect the amount an insurance carrier is willing to pay to resolve a case; they interact with one another in ways that are not purely additive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n
\r\n
CASE STRENGTH FACTORS<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
1<\/div>\r\n
Injury type and severity.<\/strong> The single strongest predictor; catastrophic permanent injuries settle for multiples of temporary injuries.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
2<\/div>\r\n
Strength of the medical evidence.<\/strong> Whether a qualified expert will credibly opine that the standard of care was breached, and whether the records corroborate that opinion.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
3<\/div>\r\n
Plaintiff’s counsel’s reputation.<\/strong> Insurance carriers maintain informal profiles of opposing counsel; attorneys with documented willingness and ability to try cases to verdict consistently secure better pre-trial offers.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
DAMAGES FACTORS<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
4<\/div>\r\n
Economic damages.<\/strong> Past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and future earning capacity, typically quantified by a life care planner and an economist.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
5<\/div>\r\n
Non-economic damages.<\/strong> Pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life; unlike many states, these are uncapped in Florida private-sector cases.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
6<\/div>\r\n
Defendant’s insurance coverage.<\/strong> Policy limits operate as a practical ceiling on recovery; cases against underinsured physicians often settle for policy limits regardless of verdict potential.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n
PROCEDURAL & STRUCTURAL FACTORS<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
7<\/div>\r\n
Florida’s modified comparative negligence rule.<\/strong> Under HB 837 (2023), a plaintiff found more than 50% at fault is barred from any recovery; partial plaintiff fault proportionally reduces the settlement.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
8<\/div>\r\n
Jurisdiction.<\/strong> Which Florida judicial circuit the case is filed in materially affects expected verdict value; the spread exceeds $320,000 between highest and lowest circuits.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
9<\/div>\r\n
Defendant type.<\/strong> Hospital versus individual physician versus nursing home versus surgery center versus governmental entity; each carries different policy structures, coverage ceilings, and sovereign immunity considerations.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Settlement Ranges by Type of Malpractice<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Different categories of medical negligence produce systematically different settlement distributions in Florida, because the resulting injury profiles cluster by category; a surgical error case, for example, typically involves a different spectrum of harms than a failure-to-diagnose case. The ranges below, drawn from the FLOIR data, represent the realistic spread of settlement outcomes for each category, inclusive of both modest and catastrophic cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Surgical Errors<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Settlements range from approximately $128,205 for minor fracture injuries to $1.5 million or more for quadriplegia<\/strong> resulting from nerve damage during spinal or cardiovascular procedures. Surgical malpractice cases include wrong-site surgery, retained foreign objects, anesthesia errors, and perforations of adjacent anatomy; the presence of a retained surgical item, which Florida law treats as presumptive negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur<\/em>, significantly increases settlement value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Cancer misdiagnosis cases can reach $800,000 to $2 million or more<\/strong>, with settlement value driven primarily by the stage at which the cancer was eventually diagnosed, the prognosis at the time of proper diagnosis compared with the prognosis at the time of negligent delay, and whether the delay rendered curable disease incurable or terminal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emergency Medicine Malpractice<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Emergency medicine cases carry distinctive liability patterns because emergency physicians operate under compressed timelines, incomplete patient histories, and high patient volumes; common fact patterns include the failure to diagnose myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, and appendicitis in ambulatory patients presenting with non-classic symptoms. Emergency medicine malpractice settlements in Florida typically average 20% higher than individual physician cases<\/strong>, and frequently involve institutional defendants including hospital-employed emergency groups and contracted emergency medicine staffing companies. The statute governing emergency medicine practice, Section 768.13 of the Florida Statutes (the Good Samaritan Act), provides heightened protections for emergency physicians in certain contexts and is a frequently litigated issue in these cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Birth Injuries and Cerebral Palsy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The average Florida cerebral palsy settlement is $2,737,530<\/strong>, reflecting the lifetime cost of specialized medical care, adaptive equipment, educational accommodations, and residential services required for children born with severe neurological injury; because these costs compound over decades, birth injury cases are among the highest-value Florida medical malpractice settlements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medication Errors<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Medication errors typically settle in the range of $207,000 to $350,000 for nerve damage outcomes<\/strong>, with the settlement rising substantially when the error produces organ failure, permanent cognitive impairment, or death; pharmacy and hospital medication systems that fail to catch known drug interactions produce institutional liability that expands the available settlement pool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anesthesia Errors<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Anesthesia-related brain damage cases average $1,791,149<\/strong> in Florida, reflecting the severity of hypoxic-ischemic injury that occurs when anesthesia is improperly administered or the patient’s airway is mismanaged during induction, maintenance, or emergence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hospital-Acquired Infections<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Hospital-acquired infections including methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infections produce an average Florida settlement of $713,894<\/strong>; sepsis and failure-to-diagnose-sepsis cases average substantially higher at $995,300<\/strong>, reflecting the catastrophic nature of septic shock and its frequently fatal outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emerging Category: AI-Assisted Diagnostic Errors<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

As artificial-intelligence-based diagnostic tools become embedded in Florida radiology, dermatology, and emergency medicine workflows, a new category of medical malpractice is emerging; claims arising from AI tools that fail to flag findings, or from human clinicians who over-rely on AI output, are beginning to appear in Florida dockets. There is no established Florida-specific settlement data for AI-assisted diagnostic error cases yet, and the standard of care framework governing such claims is evolving; injured patients pursuing these cases should retain counsel familiar with both traditional medical malpractice practice and the evolving AI-specific standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida Historical Settlement Trend (1991-2025)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Florida’s medical malpractice settlement environment has shifted meaningfully over the past three decades, and the direction of that shift is counterintuitive. Case volume has declined modestly from the peaks of the early 2000s, but total annual payouts have risen to near-record levels, which means the average value of each individual case has risen substantially; the inflation-adjusted per-case value in 2025 is materially higher than it was in 2003, despite the similar raw dollar totals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Year<\/th>\r\nReports<\/th>\r\nTotal Payouts<\/th>\r\nContext<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
1991<\/td>958<\/td>$155.27M<\/td>NPDB tracking begins<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
2000<\/td>1,416<\/td>$338.11M<\/td>Rising volume<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
2003<\/strong><\/td>1,542<\/strong><\/td>$380.72M<\/strong><\/td>Peak volume<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>\r\n
2016<\/td>1,187<\/td>$237.70M<\/td>Post-cap-removal transition<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
2022<\/td>1,277<\/td>$398.18M<\/td>Per-case values rising<\/td><\/tr>\r\n
2025<\/strong><\/td>1,135<\/strong><\/td>$421.24M<\/strong><\/td>Near-record payouts, lower volume<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

Source: National Practitioner Data Bank annual reports, 1991-2025.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The significance of this trend is that despite a 26% decline in case volume from the 2003 peak, total payouts reached a new high of $421.24 million in 2025; this reflects both the removal of the non-economic damages cap in the private sector and a shift toward higher-quality case screening, with fewer weak cases filed but substantially higher per-case recoveries on the cases that are pursued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida Medical Malpractice Settlement Estimator<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The estimator below draws on the FLOIR data tables presented earlier on this page, combined with the circuit-level and provider-type adjustments specific to Florida, and applies a FLOIR-derived economic-to-total-damages ratio to your own estimate of past medical bills to produce an order-of-magnitude settlement range for cases matching the characteristics you select. The output is a directional estimate based on historical data and is not a prediction of what any specific case will recover; actual settlement value depends on many case-specific facts that cannot be captured in a seven-variable calculator. The estimator is provided for informational purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\r\n\r\n
\r\n
FLORIDA SETTLEMENT ESTIMATOR<\/div>\r\n
Based on FLOIR closed claims data<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n\r\n
\r\n\r\n
\r\n
CASE CHARACTERISTICS<\/div>\r\n\r\n
\r\n